Version 1 of the AI for Agile Practitioners Online Course just closed its first two weeks with 250 new students. The feedback has been direct and useful: Practitioners value the realistic MegaBrain.io scenario work, the quiz design that tests judgment rather than memorization, and the focus on ethics and responsible AI alongside practical application. So far, that’s good, but AI 4 Agile v2 seriously needs your input: What topics shall I cover?
Hence, please join the AI 4 Agile v2 Survey; it won’t take more than 3 minutes.
Learn more about the current AI 4 Agile Online Course: AI 4 Agile — Master AI Integration for Agile Practitioners.
Shall I notify you about articles like this one? Awesome! You can sign up here for the ‘Food for Agile Thought’ newsletter and join 40,000-plus subscribers.
The student feedback has been direct and useful: Practitioners valued the realistic MegaBrain.io scenario work, the quiz design that tested judgment rather than memorization, and the focus on ethics and responsible AI alongside practical application. So far, so good.
One comment captured what several others echoed: The course helped people understand not just how to use AI tools, but why specific approaches matter and where the ethical boundaries sit. The quizzes, in particular, worked because they presented authentic dilemmas—the kind where there’s no perfect answer but there is a principled one. Students recognized scenarios from their own work: Pressure to meet vanity metrics, surveillance theater masquerading as transparency, the temptation to automate without understanding bias.
So, everything’s fine? No, as AI development moves faster than any curriculum can keep pace with. What worked in October 2025 needs to be revised by January or February 2026. Consider, for example:
I planned from the start to update this curriculum 2-3 times per year, and v2 development begins now.
But I’m not building this in isolation.
I need to know which topics deserve priority, which delivery formats actually work for your schedule and budget, and which proof-of-value materials would help you justify an educational investment to your leadership. The difference between a useful update and a wasted one comes down to building what practitioners need, not what sounds impressive in a course catalog.
I have created a 4-minute survey that asks direct questions, for example:
No marketing questions, no trick answers, just the information I need to make smart decisions about AI 4 Agile v2.
Please join the AI 4 Agile v2 Survey; it won’t take more than 3 minutes.
Your responses determine which tracks I build first, how I price and package the program, and what artifacts I create to support adoption. If enough people flag governance and compliance as a barrier, that moves up the priority list. If the data shows demand for agentic AI modules, I will invest there. If budget constraints cluster around a specific range, I will adjust pricing accordingly. (At $129 for the AI 4 Agile Online Course, it has already been an excellent value for money. And I like to keep it that way.)
Please chip in and complete the survey. It takes four minutes and directly shapes what I will build. ????
The AI landscape won’t slow down for us. The AI 4 Agile curriculum shouldn’t either.
